3 Apr
2013
3 Apr
'13
12:35 p.m.
2013/4/3 Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net>et>:
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 11:01 +0200, Raffaele Morelli
wrote:
Quoting from you message
"My claim isn't that tests are completely useless, it's just that
especially for the pharmaceutical industry and food mafia those tests
are done in a way that it's clear, what the result will be. "
If you claim that it's clear "what a result will be" when using those
test for medical statistics you are implicitly saying that everyone
manipulate double blind tests, as researchers/PhD for cancer
treatments do in universities and pharmaceutical industries.
Stop making "naive" statements on topics widely recognized by the
scientific community like double blind tests.
That said, I give up because simply can't stand your never ending
threads on/against every single topic and the resulting overall
confusion... which ranges from -∞ to +∞
/r
--
L'unica speranza di catarsi, ammesso che ne esista una, resta affidata
all'istinto di ribellione, alla rivolta non isterilita in progetti,
alla protesta violenta e viscerale. (V. Evangelisti)
2013/4/3 Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net>
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 08:18 +0200, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
> 2013/4/3 Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net>et>:
My claim isn't that tests are
completely useless
Ralf, be serious when talking about medical treatment against deathly
disease like cancer is. You can't claim that every and all university
PhDs are aiming at selling drugs instead of a cure.
And in addition I wrote
The pharmaceutical industry are a good example to
prove that I'm not
mistaken.
Could you please quote where I ever claimed that "every and all
university PhDs are aiming at selling drugs instead of a cure"?
Just a rhetorical question.
You judge that I don't know what I'm talking about, by insinuate on
claims I never made ;D.