25 Feb
2006
25 Feb
'06
6:47 p.m.
Just went back and reread the thread re: Plextor drivers, as we are looking to buy a
DVD-burner, and have been very happy with our Plexwriter, and previous Plextor CD burner.
(Also read the entire thread on cdfreaks.com re:Pxlinux )
This is the second time this month I've run into a situation where a hardware
manufacturer is refusing both to release their own linux drivers/software, or the
information necessary for others to write their own.
This makes no rational sense to me.
How on earth does it harm them to allow someone else, on their own time and own dime, to
write a driver or program for another OS, unless the company is planning to write their
own drivers/software and sell them - which in the case of both Plextor and RME does not
appear to be the case.
Allowing 3rd party drivers/software can only increase the market for their products, as
they will then be usable on a broader array of operating systems. Bigger market = more $$
for them, doesn't it?
What possible gain is there for them to coerce users into using a M$ OS?
Unless . . . . .
Not being a programmer, or knowing what is involved in writing drivers I am just
wondering:
could it be that MS is refusing to release whatever code is necessary for the hardware
manufacturers to write their MS-compatible drivers/software unless they acquiesce to some
sort of exclusivity agreement - i. e. agree to neither write Linux (or other OS)
drivers/sw, nor release their own hw info that would allow anyone else to do so?
I just cannot think of any other reason why hardware manufacturers would want to lock
their product into a single OS.
- Maluvia