12 Oct
2011
12 Oct
'11
7:34 a.m.
On 10/11/2011 06:52 PM, Monty Montgomery wrote:
It also doesn't negate something else which may be more difficult to
categorize, and that is there are apparently many who PREFER the sound
of their music encoded as mp3. I've read two studies where blind A/B
tests were performed on various groups, and a large portion of those in
their teens/early 20s preferred grainy, compressed mp3s over .wav.
So, apparently there's something else at work when we talk about what
sounds "good" or even "better."
--
---
Check out the website I've been cobbling together. It will never be
done, but it's a start:
http://lateralforce.no-ip.org
My blog, with commentary on a variety of things, including audio,
mixing, equipment, etc, is at:
http://audioandmore.wordpress.com
Staat heißt das kälteste aller kalten Ungeheuer. Kalt lügt es auch;
und diese Lüge kriecht aus seinem Munde: 'Ich, der Staat, bin das Volk.'
- [Friedrich Nietzsche]
Responding to
myself here. Out of curiosity, I just did some AB'ing
(hadn't in a very long time)
A/B doesn't remove confirmation bias unless
it's randomized. Perhaps
that's what you meant (FTR, squishyball will give you casual A/B,
randomized A/B, A/B/X and X/X/Y testing).
Some very high end ears routinely fall prey to this-- It's not that
you can't trust your ears, it's the brain that's gullible.