8 Oct
2011
8 Oct
'11
3:16 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin(a)linuxuse.de> wrote:
Am 06.10.2011 16:27, schrieb Rui Nuno Capela:
Yes yes yes. This is the worst "feature" of QTractor. I don't give a
$%^& what the filename of an individual clip is, and I don't want to
be interrupted to think about where on disk the file should be stored.
Stash it in a per-session directory, or a "clip library" or whatever.
Don't make me think about that mess I call my home directory.
DISCLAIMER: I haven't used qtractor in a while; I assume it still
works this way. If not, someone tell me to shut up.
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:46:29 +0400, Louigi Verona
<louigi.verona(a)gmail.com> wrote:
As far as I am concerned I see it as a remarkable improvement. It brings
some of the virtues of a loop-oriented sequencer I sometimes missed in
Qtractor.
To detach a clip from its siblings by giving it a new name makes perfect
sense to me still.... it would be nice to have some automatism that simply
iterates the filename. Some people feel a disturbance in the force, if they
have to switch from editing notes in a pianoroll to typing filenames ;-) Hey Rui!
Thanks a lot for implementing the clip thing - I remember asking for
that myself a long time ago )
question is, does it work now as you asked/wanted back then?