9 Jan
2012
9 Jan
'12
4:56 p.m.
Hi Moshe,
Yup recent convert to Arch here, its a very nice way of keeping on top of
your linux distro: All options are available to you, config files are
*very* well laid out, and documentation is extremely good. For
configuration its really flexible, but it does require a certain amount of
config before its running optimally in my experience.
That said, configuring it is very easy and rewarding, it just does what you
tell it to do, without trying to be smarter than you and changing stuff for
you.
AVLinux is a more "polished" solution and you'll no doubt need less effort
to get it running, but then you've lost some control over how it works, and
you'll have to pray its good.
TangoStudio is Ubuntu based, and I had a pretty good experience there...
not very RT performance, but stable @ 20ms or so. Here on Arch I'm pushing
to 5ms, and getting pretty good results :)
I'ma happy Arch user, but its definatly not the distro for everyone... as
some Arch people put it: Arch doesn't find you, Archers find Arch
-Harry
On , Moshe Werner <moshwe(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Raffaele,
thanks for the reply!
My needs would be:
Mainly tracking (by now up to 8 channels at given time).
Mixing and monitoring - Yep
Realtime fx - also yes.
Tried AVlinux and found it to be pretty cool, but its
32 bit and till now
I'm used to 64 bit and wouldlike to keep using the more advanced PC
technology. (Finally when Protools 11 takes the leap into 64bit
technology it would be sad to see my Linux system going backwards).
Heard good things about Arch in audio use too. Anyone
got experience with
Arch use for pro audio?
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Raffaele Morelli
raffaele.morelli(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2012/1/9 Moshe Werner moshwe(a)gmail.com>
Hi everyone,
after many years of studio work using the openSuse
distro with the
kernel-rt from Jan Engelhard it seems that he no longer continues his
great work on rt kernels.
Being more on the recording engineer side of things and not a Linux
expert (user yes, expert no) I really fret at the thought of patching and
compiling my own kernel package.
I would like to hear your opinions on what distro is
solid for audio work
and has a reliable rt kernel.
Also I would appreciate if you could explain the degree of difficulty and
learning curve of the specific distro.
debian lover since 2005 here :-) rock solid
I won't try to explain debian learning curve because of too many if/then
sentences to work with :-)
A lot of work has been done since 2005 and actually
AFAIK the features
offered by the rt patch are being merged in the kernel mainline little by
little and actually I can say that a debian stock kernel is really near
the rt one... depending on your needs (record? mixing? both? +
monitoring? + realtime fx? and how many tracks?...).
BTW, there are several multimedia distros around and
they do not require
you to do tricky things on your system and some are debian based (eg. AV
linux).
PS I tried to use Ubuntu on the same machine I use
openSuse 11.2 on and
got pretty bad results regarding latency and x runs on jack 2.
Don't know about openSuse but Ubuntu is debian
with lipstick and
makeup... too much IMHO :-)
regards
-r
--
L'unica speranza di catarsi, ammesso che ne esista una,
resta affidata all'istinto di ribellione, alla rivolta non isterilita
in progetti, alla protesta violenta e viscerale.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org