15 Feb
2014
15 Feb
'14
6:28 p.m.
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 18:15:24 +0100
Renato <rennabh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 10:03:07 +0100
Edgar Aichinger <edogawa(a)aon.at> wrote:
Don't know if this is any
help, but in the current version of Rosegarden you
can mark a starting tempo and a finishing tempo and tell it to slowly go from
one to the other. You can go either faster or slower, and set as many markers
as you like.
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
Am Freitag, 14. Februar 2014, 23:57:04 schrieb
Renato:
well yeah that was my idea from the start... probably I should have
be more clear (and not use "time stretch" in the subject). The problem
is that manually inputing tempo changes won't give a smooth enough
accelerando, and it's not a very nice way of doing things anyway. I'm
looking for a more automated solution
Does anyone know if the script klick2ardour.py is supposed to work with
ardour 3 sessions? It does nothing to my session On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 20:32:29 +0100
raf <rmouneyres(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think he means putting several decreasing tempo markers for your
accelerando to ardour's timeline, then re-record hydrogen while both
sync to jack transport - then hydrogen should follow ardour's tempo
and there would be no need for timestretching...
Hello,
i'd recommend to create a tempo map (vs timestreching which would
lead to artefacts) As you mention recording in ardour, you could
use it to create the tempo map,
hi, what is a "tempo map" and how do you create it in ardour?
couldn't find anything about it. I don't want to manually enter
single tempo changes in ardour