On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 7:20 AM, jonetsu <jonetsu(a)teksavvy.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 May 2018 10:45:41 +0200
David Kastrup <dak(a)gnu.org> wrote:
What does "made on Linux" even mean?
If I record stuff with brand
microphones and a brand video camera on an acoustic instrument without
editing and/or EQ, where is the contribution of Linux?
Is Linux such a demanding system that you have to contribute to it ?
Is the definition of 'user' updated in this context to mean someone
that contributes ? Simple users of the OS are banned ?
I also thought about that as all my synths, mixers, EQ and compressors are
analog hardware . I avoid DAW's via Zoom recorders since I am on Linux
computers too much already for my day job.
I may be a snowflake though as most of the users I see on forums use DAW's
and plugins for soft synths, mixing, mastering etc.
Since you mentioned video though ... AFAIK its not practical to edit on
hardware these days. I have not used another OS besides Linux in any
capacity since the 90's so I use what's available. TBH I am struggling a
bit even in the forums and may install CentOS for Davinci Resolve but that
is another story. Still, Linux is a big part of that process as I also bash
script video processing with ffmpeg. Definitely feels "made on Linux" to me
ymmv.
Cheers.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user