@Atte, what is the next DAW(s) you're using?
How does Radium compare to Renoise?
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Atte <atte(a)youmail.dk> wrote:
On 04/16/2014 12:53 PM, Vytautas Jancauskas wrote:
What are the many other reasons?
From the top of my head:
* No support for sustain pedal on renoise native instruments (and no
interest in adding it)
* Doesn't work well with lot's of long samples
* X-fade loop broken, no interest in fixing, I even posted a python script
to show how it's done without magic
* New version is a step in a direction I don't like
* "remove unused samples" feature removed
* loop editor removed
* don't get the new instrument design
Although I don't completely understand
> the first problem either... Trackers are most suited for the kind of
> music you would buy an MPC for I guess.
True. In '09 when I started using renoise, the options were quite limited.
Renoise was the only stable, well rounded music software I could find. I
always felt that the tracker interface counter-productive and backwards
(although it has it's strong points). So you could say that I lived with
and learned to work with/agains the tracker part of renoise until now.
Today it's different, there are quite a few options.
--
Atte
http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user