6 Feb
2013
6 Feb
'13
12:49 p.m.
Well, even in a small company the developers spend a lot more time in meetings than the
typical hobbyist.
Other than that...
Thanks,
Bill Gribble
On Feb 6, 2013, at 6:44, Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona(a)gmail.com> wrote:
"i work in a big fancy datacenter. so, the
question is:
should i treat about 3/4 servers there as 'hobbyist' ?"
Sure, why not?
"hobbyist" refers to how something was done,
not how it is then being used.
i don't think that it is accurate anymore to think of the development process for the
linux kernel as "hobbyist".
it is probably a better description of the application space, but even there, it
doesn't apply across the board.
people who don't develop software (and even some who do) sometimes imagine that the
process inside a company than actually pays its developers is radically different from the
one that involves hobbyists. the differences are not as dramatic as you might think, and
in the case of particularly small companies, there can effectively be no difference at
all.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user