17 Aug
2007
17 Aug
'07
10:29 a.m.
Am 2007-08-14 05:55:25, schrieb Chris McCormick:
My vote is for people to 'reply to all' when
they want to reply to
all/list, and 'reply' when they want to reply just to the sender (keep
it how it is right now, as is supported in all mail clients).
The problem is, that most peoples are to sick or lazzy to remove the
Private-Address when using Reply-To-All. I receive per day 10-20
Carbon Copies and sometime I was wondering WHY the message does NOT
APPEAR in the lists... Argh!!!
I am subscribed with TWO E-Mails on this list, One which suck the
messages and is 100% SPAM-FREE and then the second, which I use to
post here, which receive per day between 500 and 38.000 SPAMs.
I have configured my procmail/MUA, that if I am IN the LAU/LAD folder
I use the List-Reply but if I am in my "linux4michelle" folder I use
"Reply" which mean, if someone use "Reply-To-All" and do not remove
my E-Mail I get it twice and since I check "linux4michelle" before
"LAU/LAD" I will end up in PM's.
I am voting for a "Driver-License" for the Internet-Use.
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
0033/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)