Re: [LAU] [slightly OT] Musical citation (what is allowed?)

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Julien Claassen [mailto:julien@mail.upb.de] Gesendet: Do 12/1/2011 13:15 An: Ralf Mardorf Cc: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org; linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org Betreff: Re: [LAU] [slightly OT] Musical citation (what is allowed?) Hello Ralf! Well I think I'll quote from the main theme and it's important to quote from THIS PIECE and hopefully make it recogniseable, if short. So I do go the official channel. But I'm not too worried. We'll see, otherwise I'll have to think of something else. :-) Kind regards Julien For sure you don't quote a mainstream, millenium moneymaker, but a musician. Quotation is wanted. Some dinos became musicians, because there parents (at least one of them was/) were moneymakers ;). Generalisation? NO! Just brutal truth ;). Since I know you from off-list discussions, I'll put my shirt on you "heißt hoffentlich das ich "meine Hand für Dich ins Feuer legen kann"", that you don't have "evil designs". Regarding to vanity I re-composed songs I wrote, that make me feel, that I might have stolen an idea. The term for doing this is "obsessional neurosis". Hehehe, I like obsession, I like ethics, BUT DON'T CARE ABOUT QUOTATION. Just a thought! Is it possible to get in contact with the composer? If not, are you planing world domination? Music, is music, is music ;). You are allowed to do what's good for music. No artist cares about the written laws. Ethic is the only rule. C'mon you aren't anti-ethically. Don't waste your time with this thought, I did much to often and rewrote songs ... stupid me!!!