20 Dec
2010
20 Dec
'10
7:46 p.m.
Em segunda-feira 20 dezembro 2010, às 16:39:45, Dieter Plaetinck escreveu:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:26:31 -0500
Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
true
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Fabio
<capoeirista(a)arcor.de> wrote:
the ardour3-svn pgkbuild in AUR is basically nothing more then a simple
script which saves users who want to run from svn some typing work.
this is not an official package or whatever.
users who use this know that it is not supported by Arch and obviously,
that it builds from svn. what should probably be added is a clear
disclaimer "do not ask upstream for support on this unless you know how
to debug" or something like that.
Removing the pkgbuild (and hence just making it harder to run from svn)
doesn't solve the core problem. a warning like the one above does.
Dieter
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
ok, i was just asking, since the maintainer there
comented it.
no need to get angry, we are just curious..lol
i'm angry because i've said all the way through ardour3 development
that packaging of any kind doesn't make any sense. i'm upset that
someone would give users a 2nd-rate experience by making them think
that they had received an "important" version of ardour3 rather than
just another svn commit that will be out of date in a few hours.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user