3 Jun
2010
3 Jun
'10
11:02 p.m.
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 11:47:21AM +0200, Philipp ??berbacher wrote:
Excerpts from Brent Busby's message of 2010-06-03
12:43:39 +0200:
Wait, what?
Last I was following this, Paul was saying fairly consistently that jackdmp was intended
to replace jackd. Newer codebase, better implementation, C++ not C, multi-core, etc etc.
Has that position changed while I wasn't paying attention?
-ken
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, david wrote:
Neither is the successor of the other, neither is deprecated. It's two
implementations developed in parallel. I don't know all those details. JackDMP 1.9.x
works here where I
couldn't get JACK 0.116 to work. But I've only got lowly single-core
processors here.
Hmm... That's mostly what I was wanting to know. I've heard the 0.x
series is more mature, and I've been using it -- but does that mean the
1.x series is deprecated? Is it working for most people?