14 Jan
2013
14 Jan
'13
2:09 p.m.
On Sun, January 13, 2013 8:59 pm, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 04:11:33PM -0500, Brett McCoy
wrote:
None needed. In the context I wasn't saying one mammal was closer to human
than the other, just that monkeys are not very bright.... maybe that makes
them closer to human after all.
--
Len Ovens
www.OvenWerks.net
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Chris Bannister
<cbannister(a)slingshot.co.nz> wrote:
Ahh %$#@, for some stupid reason I was thinking of gibbons and orangutans
and
gorillas.
Huge apologies Len! On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 09:53:45AM -0800, Len
Ovens wrote:
us
On Sun, January 13, 2013 9:51 am, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I suspect
> we are still monkeys.
Good thing you said monkeys, Apes are smart enough to be insulted...
Just to nitpick here, but we are closer to chimpanzees than apes or
monkeys, in fact apparently, chimpanzees are more closely related to than apes or monkeys.
Chimpanzees *are* apes!