7 Dec
2005
7 Dec
'05
6:02 p.m.
guy wrote:
Lars Luthman wrote:
Yes, AutoTune is definitely evil!
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 14:49 -0500, Lee Revell
wrote:
Hi
The Steve Harris plug in transposes everything by a fixed amount.
Antares autotune 'tunes' out of tune sounds - it has been used as an
effect but is also the number 1 criminal in propping up bands where
people look trendy but can't actually sing in tune. When you get used
to its distinct On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 06:24 -0500, Joe Hartley
wrote:
Steve Harris has a pitch shifter plugin:
http://plugin.org.uk/ladspa-swh/docs/ladspa-swh.html#tth_sEc2.6
I don't know if it will produce the same artifacts when abused.
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 23:07:47 +0100
Cesare Marilungo <cesare(a)poeticstudios.com> wrote:
> That's exactly what I was talking about. There are lots of it. I
> think one of the first was the Antares (it exists both for
> ProTools and as a VST).
>
Just an FYI, the Antares AutoTune existed as a standalone rack unit
before it was a plug-in.
Obligatory Linux content: what's the LADSPA equivalent?
sound you can recognise it on a lot of chart records.
I used a
friends copy on a guitar line once & it made it sound really 'sweet'
- it was actually a very nice sound, you can add a certain amount of
vibrato too. I'd love it on Linux - it can be like sprinkling fairy
dust on a take - but it does raise aesthetic/ethical issues about
music as a result of ones ability versus music as a result of ones
vision.
BTW: I have loved this series of vocal tips - thanks folks!
Guy
Basically the 'cher' effect we're talking about is the result of
setting
the response speed of the pitch correction to a very small amount. Even
the best singer reaches the correct pitch by listening to himself, it's
a continuous feedback. When using such an effect the voice goes from a
pitch to another so fast it sounds fake.
c.