27 Mar
2006
27 Mar
'06
3:46 p.m.
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-audio-user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu [mailto:linux-audio-
user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 12:29 PM
To: A list for linux audio users
Cc: daniel(a)linuxaudio.org
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] More about consolidation of the Linux
audioonline resources (was: linuxdj...)
ico wrote:
Not yet,
I initially misunderstood Paul by skimming over his e-mail that he wanted to
move the content. Now that I've figured that out, it seems that the only thing
we need to get the site linked is Paul's current URL/IP where he's hosting the
content. Paul?
Also, I am not sure what would be more effective in terms of linking
linuxaudio.org/developer or linuxaudio.org/lad. IMHO both have merit (the
first does not have any redundancy in its name, but the second one is more
accurate in terms of traditional LAD name). Perhaps someone else wants to
chime in with an opinion on this one, or should we simply link both of them
for the time being so that the site becomes available while we discuss the
details? ;-)
Ico
Sounds absolutely fine by me!
I am not sure which would sound better, linuxaudio.org/developers or
linuxaudio.org/lad. IMHO both have merit. Should we have both (via a
sym-link)?
Please contact me off-list for the necessary login info so that I can
begin
uploading stuff.
So, Do we have a new LAD site available now?
-ERic Rz.