måndag 22 januari 2007 15:04 skrev Dave Phillips:
Btw, I did continue monitoring the traffic for the /.
thread re: music
sequencing software for Linux. Same old same old. Paul got some good
response, but overall I'd say the thread was a waste of everybody's
time. The ignorance on /. regarding Linux audio development is simply
too deep, and I see little indication that posters there want to do
little but echo the same old mantras.
To get visibility for LA[UD] the debate should be started by the LA[UD] side.
Not the contrary. The problem is that people don't bother to read more than 1
or 2 comments. At least I do that and I concider myself sort of normal. I
should say that I got tired of /. a few years ago so I'm not that up to date
whats happening on there but I did read this article that we are talking
about.
So. Receipt for small success. Schedule a few articles on /. Especially
articles from the people who develop software and people who use them. Not
the debaters who debate for it's own sake.
Has any user on this list come here by being persuaded
by what he or she
has read on Slashdot ?
If you aske me, that is a definite no.
regards,
/bengan