23 Jan
2003
23 Jan
'03
9:23 a.m.
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 13:46:52 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote
Hi,
Mike Rawes schrieb:
I think there is a difference between modular synths and modular programming
environments, they are not necessarily the same thing. You certainly never had
subpatches on analogue modulars :) Having said that I think it's inevitable
that ssm will be getting this functionality (in fact Joe Jones has been
working on this). I don't want ssm to be seen as a programming environment though.
dave
Module wiring: The biggest improvement is to
implement sub-patches [yes,
I know there are plans for this in SSM :] - that way you can hide a lot
of detail in a single module.
Definetly. IMO subpatches in a modular synth are as important as
"Undo" in a text editor. They not only can hide things, they make
modular and object oriented development with lots of re-use
possible. In this regard it also is crucial, that subpatches accept
arguments like functions in most programming languages (C, Python,
...).