6 May
2009
6 May
'09
8:14 a.m.
Hi,
They both have alot of power under the hood. I think blender has a nicer
interface tho.
My problem with cinelerra-cv was that I couldn't cut the video track
without also cutting the audio track.
I tried for a couple of hours to get it to play nice but it seemed like
the selection tool could not be made to work per track.
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd
Raffaele Morelli wrote:
I would say that the best tool on linux for
manipulating video is
cinelerra, blender is a 3D modeler.
cinelerra supports many video file formats other than the well known
DV,MPEG,AVI and has a lot of plugin to work with audio as well.
-r
2009/5/5 Eric Steinberg <eric.steinberg(a)gmail.com
<mailto:eric.steinberg@gmail.com>>
Blender is not intuitive, nor is it a video file editor, but it is
the best tool on linux for manipulating video, and it does support
import of mpeg/avi/mov. Most jobs that you can do with a
cuts-only editor can be done in the sequencing window of Blender.
You probably won't find a time-stretch tool for video, as video
is frame-based (there is an "add to clip" feature in Quicktime Pro
on Mac OS that will do the job, but nothing similar on linux).
I've had the most success, other than Blender, with Kdenlive,
although only on 32-bit...
The very best cheap (twenny bucks, yo) tool for this operation is
Quicktime Pro. Has anyone run the Windows version of Quicktime
Pro under WINE? Fixing sync issues is literally a two or three
step operation:
1. trim audio
2. trim video
3. add to clip
Done!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user