26 Jan
2005
26 Jan
'05
4:25 p.m.
aacplus does sound great, even at 32kbs bitrate. It's developed by
Coding Technologies (
http://www.codingtechnologies.com/products/aacPlus.htm ). There is an
article about it on slate ( http://slate.com/Default.aspx?id=2112548&
).
about Licensing--
http://www.codingtechnologies.com/licensing/aacplus.htm I actually
send an email inquiry to info(a)codingtechnologies.com and I am waiting
for a reply.
aacplus is an enhanced MPEG4-audio. it plays in winamp and vlc. Does
it play in xmms and other linux audio players? I guess it shoud.!
guerrier
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:58:29 -0600
From: "Steven Clift" <slc(a)publicus.net>
Subject: [linux-audio-user] AacPlus compared to Ogg
To: <linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu>
Message-ID: <02cc01c50257$7520eeb0$6500a8c0@PUBLICUS2>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
I understand the licensing differences between Ogg and MP3. What about
the newer aacPlus?
The new KCMP is using aacPlus because they claim they can webcast near
CD-quality with a pretty small stream:
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/radio/services/thecurrent/
(It is great!
I am trying to get them to add Ogg and MP3 to reach more people.
Steve
Steven Clift - http://publicus.net - Reply to: clift(a)publicus.net
Join DoWire: http://dowire.org
E-Democracy: http://e-democracy.org
------------------------------