10 Mar
2005
10 Mar
'05
6:33 p.m.
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 22:25 +0000, james(a)dis-dot-dat.net wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar, 2005 at 05:08PM -0500, Eric Dantan
Rzewnicki spake thus:
Wouldn't fluidsynth be a good place to start? It's command line, and it
can load soundfonts and dump info on them already. Plus it's a good
synth.
Lee
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 10:53:58PM +0100,
Christoph Eckert wrote:
Sounds good, but until it's as common as SF2, I personally will stick
with what we're trying to achieve here: a commandline SF2 processor,
for mouse-o-phobics (like me) and for people that need something more
accessible (like Julien). Hi,
I don't know how featurefull it is, but specimen's beef bank format
might be worth looking into. I chatted with the author a while ago on
#lad at freenode. My fuzzy memory is that it uses xml and wouldn't be
too hard to script. If it is not open enough to take advantage of
then is there
any truly open soundfont-like standard anywhere on the
planet?
for me it somehow looks as there's need to define a new,
absolutely free file format for sampling data.
Unfortunately, this would need lots of time and resources, and
as 'we' are not enough users, it wouldn't be spread widely
enough.