30 Jun
2010
30 Jun
'10
4:47 p.m.
On Wednesday 30 June 2010 10:03:12 Lorenzo wrote:
I think there maybe is an ambiguity in the word and
concept of
'copying'... How would you (Louigi) feel if I took the text at
http://www.louigiverona.ru/?page=projects&s=writings&t=linux&a=…
which (I guess) is a work you took time and effort to write, copied
(ripped it), printed it and sold it at $10 a copy changing the title and
putting under my own name without of course even giving you credit?
See, you have to go too far...
http://dangernovel.blogspot.com/
you can take that and sell copies of it all you like and keep the money.
Taking my name off of it and putting yours on it is a *separate* issue to the
issue of making copies of it.
The name thing is a fraud on the public. It is lying.
We could easily have a plagiarism law separate from a copyright law if we
chose to do so.
Moral rights in a work under a different law than copyrights as it were.
all the best,
drew