22 Feb
2006
22 Feb
'06
12:23 a.m.
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 23:13 -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:42:55PM -0500, Lee Revell
wrote:
To be clear, I don't really agree with me either - the consequences
are too radical for me to just swallow.
But at the same time, I can't really think of a cogent
counterarguement that doesn't involve things like "Well, I didn't
*intend* that number to be a program..."
Why is this a problem - intent is very VERY important in law.
Lee
Sorry I
beg to differ, ever hear of an "MP3"?
OK, I missed your last paragraph. But I still don't agree with you ;-)