22 Dec
2009
22 Dec
'09
7:04 a.m.
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, sonofzev(a)iinet.net.au wrote:
TMany that use MusE regularly are more concerned about
jackmidi and
other features that bring new functionality or interoperability. From
my understanding QT4 is more of a cosmetic update and wouldn't
necessarily bring more sequencer functionality in. (correct me if I'm
wrong) However migrating could require a major overhaul....
Robert and Tim have put in a hell of a lot of work in the past year or
so and MusE is functioning really really well. It may look a bit
dated.. but that's really not the point is it?
Actually, I'm kind of dreading KDE/QT 4, because nothing I've seen or
heard of it has impressed me. As for looking dated, these days, usually
that seems to be defined by most people as not looking like a recent
version of Windows, which also isn't something I really aspire to with
my desktop anyway.
I think I'd agree with everything you've said -- if MusE (or any app)
decided to stay on QT3 for longer, it wouldn't break my heart at all!
--
+ Brent A. Busby + "We've all heard that a million monkeys
+ UNIX Systems Admin + banging on a million typewriters will
+ University of Chicago + eventually reproduce the entire works of
+ Physical Sciences Div. + Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet,
+ James Franck Institute + we know this is not true." -Robert Wilensky