On 25 September 2010 05:51, Patrick Shirkey
<pshirkey(a)boosthardware.com>
 wrote:
 On Fri, September 24, 2010 9:54 am, Folderol wrote:
  On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:35:22 -0700
 Ken Restivo <ken(a)restivo.org> wrote:
  I guess they're used to eye candy over there
in closed software land.
 Hell, I liked Jamin too until Fons hipped me to the fact that it's a
 vocoder. 
 
 Just out of interest, when did this become a fact?
 IIRC Fons suggested the sc4 compressor algorithm was similar to a
 vocoder.
 Apart from the multiband parametric, limiter and overall ui development
 that are also part of the jamin experience, I have never heard anything
 coming out of jamin that sounds remotely like a vocoder.
 I have also not heard of any other jack application that attempts to
 provide a complete mastering tool chain.
 So, I'm not sure why jamin is now to be considered passe.
 Of course if someone else actually wrote something that was comparable
 in
 functionality then I would be more than interested to hear the results.
 But until that time jamin still stands as the only tool in it's class
 that
 I know of.
 
 has development stopped because the devs just found other things they
 preferred to work on or were there good reasons to stop development of
 it?