30 Mar
2019
30 Mar
'19
8:23 p.m.
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 10:43 AM Max <abonnements(a)revolwear.com> wrote:
Makes sense. My thinking was that I could possibly get lower latency and
less overhead if I only acquire two or four channels instead of 24 or 64
from which I leave the majority idle... But I understand its just now
how ALSA was designed.
Channel count is never going to affect latency unless you are do much
processing that dealing with N times more channels takes you over the edge
of what your CPU can do in a given time interval. While that's not
impossible, it's also not likely.