12 Feb
2010
12 Feb
'10
8:12 a.m.
On 02/12/2010 12:42 PM, sv-e(a)sv-e.dk wrote:
30 seconds of serious listening ?
Well, you can't really seriously judge a recording after having listened
to it for 30 secs, I know. It is just my impression. And I guess my
impression is pretty biased too because I don't like this kind of music.
I should've better watched the whole video.
Are you saying it's a hoax ?
I've listened to it a bit more closely (well, for about 30 secs, I think
this is horrible) and I think this is a studio recording and they added
some background noise afterwards. Also because the background noise
doesn't loop, no effects affect the background noise, it makes me wonder
how this is recorded. Or they recorded the video and he did some
overdubs afterwards. But hopefully for the guy I'm wrong. And even
though a lot of comments mention that this guy has talent I oppose to
that. This is a good example of craftsmanship, not talent.
Jeremy
I have no experience with that kind of music, but the background noise
doesn't have to come from the microphone he's using for vocals, but could
come from the video cameras microphone. An ordinary vocal microphone is
not that sensitive at all.
That video camera must have a damn' good microphone on it then I reckon :)
The fact that he is capable of making the loops write
the lyrics and
perform it all together makes me think he's got lot's of "talent"
/sv-e
Being able to multitask doesn't equal talent. There are a lot of
musicians who master just one or two instruments who have a lot more
talent than this guy. As an anology, it reminds me of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xtp2TWI1764
The guy is very good at doing his thing but it's no art and you don't
need to be talented to do such a thing.
Best,
Jeremy