21 Aug
2012
21 Aug
'12
7:44 p.m.
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 19:27:59 +0200, Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 19:21 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
I was just pointing out why deciding boot order between kernels may be
unneeded, if keeping -generic and -lowlatency on the same machine, as they
are more or less the same kernel.
Don't see how editing files manually, and installing legacy software makes
things complicated compared to doing nothing at all.
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:06:22 +0200, James Harkins
<jamshark70(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Not overkill, since -lowlatency is a -generic, but with a different
configuration. Why keep -generic, if you don't need it for anything?
Or else
- you simply edit grub.cfg manually, as I did
- you switch to grub legacy, as I did and edit menu.lst manually as I do
:p
Why making things unneeded complicated?
Regards,
Ralf
> From: "Kaj Ailomaa"
> To make linux-lowlatency default, I'd just not install linux-generic
at
all.
Maybe overkill: grub-customizer lets you choose whichever installed
kernel you want to be the default.