23 Nov
2015
23 Nov
'15
6:04 p.m.
On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:48:02 +0100
Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:33:44 -0500,
jonetsu(a)teksavvy.com wrote:
Yes, this could be a good question when wanting to actually go to
/much/ higher sampling rates. The math should be straightforward but I
haven't done it. The example given shows a significant amount of disk
space used when sampling at 174,000 something for only a few seconds,
hundreds of thousands of KB.
But the 15 tracks, even the synths and synth
drums, will take so many
more megabytes of space, because the sampling rate is not set on a
per track basis.
About what values of sample rates are you talking? How less disk space
do you have?