2 Jul
2003
2 Jul
'03
10:02 p.m.
Paul Perkins wrote:
--
|\ _,,,---,,_
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ HTTP 503: Too Busy
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL
.::. www.iriXx.org .::. www.copyleftmedia.org.uk .::.
Musicians say No to RIAA Persecution and Prosecution of Music Lovers!
Sign the petition at http://www.copyleftmedia.org.uk/justsayno/
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 01:52 pm, Mark Knecht
wrote:
to add to the OT... Daniel and i have been organising a petition, signed
by musicians, against the RIAA's latest persecutions - with the emphasis
being on suggesting more positive means to promote music rather than
persecute music lovers.
http://www.copyleftmedia.org.uk/justsayno/
m~
In my mind, using something I didn't pay for,
or didn't pay the money to
the real owner, just isn't right. Theft is one word for this if you
actively seek out this property. Accepting stolen goods might be another
term if someone just gives it to me.
Well, look at typical music industry practice in dealing with musicians. Most
of the time, the creative talent gets ripped off (not paid) by the record
company. Then by the above rule, buying a "legitimate record company" CD is
"accepting stolen goods". So there is no morally correct way to hear
"music
industry product" recordings. Maybe everyone should go back to making their
own music, live, at least until the RIAA cartel withers away. Or at least
keeps the ownership of the recordings out of the hands of those crooks.
OK, OK, mostly off-topic, but not completely...