8 Jun
2011
8 Jun
'11
1:16 a.m.
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 19:08 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> wrote:
I'll read this article, because I'm interested in such things, not only
regarding to music, I started reading, but 1. I'm a dyslexic and 2. my
English is terribly broken, so I have to delay reading it. It's 01:12 (1
hour after midnight) in Germany, not a good time for me, to read a long
text, even in German.
Again. I like timing of humans and 4 to 15 ms is what I experience as
pleasant, but this is not related to jitter by a machine, when recording
a rhythm group, one instrument after the other. We aren't talking about
the same topic.
Regards,
Ralf
I'm weak ... I discuss :D
I'm completely untalented for drumming,
I'm not kidding or sarcastic.
My guitar playing is also within 10ms and sometimes much more worse, but
for syncopation e.g. this human 'jitter' tends to be always to early,
seldom to be to late, it's different for a machine.
OK, so you chose not to read the article. That's a shame because its
actually one of the most interesting things i've read in a long time
(not so much the stuff about musical timing, but even that).