15 Feb
2014
15 Feb
'14
6:15 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 10:03:07 +0100
Edgar Aichinger <edogawa(a)aon.at> wrote:
Am Freitag, 14. Februar 2014, 23:57:04 schrieb
Renato:
well yeah that was my idea from the start... probably I should have
be more clear (and not use "time stretch" in the subject). The problem
is that manually inputing tempo changes won't give a smooth enough
accelerando, and it's not a very nice way of doing things anyway. I'm
looking for a more automated solution
Does anyone know if the script klick2ardour.py is supposed to work with
ardour 3 sessions? It does nothing to my session
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 20:32:29 +0100
raf <rmouneyres(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think he means putting several decreasing tempo markers for your
accelerando to ardour's timeline, then re-record hydrogen while both
sync to jack transport - then hydrogen should follow ardour's tempo
and there would be no need for timestretching...
Hello,
i'd recommend to create a tempo map (vs timestreching which would
lead to artefacts) As you mention recording in ardour, you could
use it to create the tempo map,
hi, what is a "tempo map" and how do you create it in ardour?
couldn't find anything about it. I don't want to manually enter
single tempo changes in ardour
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS/6CwAAoJEBz6xFdttjrf/vUH/1RaegskCqwXXl0urdCBpUYK
rqGNPu6xolqyP+IIpJejCNEGs1YUz1TEH8J/Ek4ixaqARwXBWQv78lyyvTu2CDj7
XpoqUwidxRaoigbQPhBuVlEys6uw6j95jdIU20jxvQGdPXJx7OqEZv4oaje1XIS/
+ew0wBEE/y2TtePO4uM9BYY75iKqo2GCK8auA6WXpWvkoYHZuI1cRdIXMTHFb7CB
rJNgpb9OkL/OMnVmVr07ZqY9lXTzaVaSSvow8yc9JmOZ3qzFaM6suS4lBQs0+aSK
f4pDItoaLIDNfqpzyfXRM3H/cEPoxl4DWP7PZ9daO0ZCDpbOjl99JKxCZ2o69BI=
=kPeG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----