27 Sep
2014
27 Sep
'14
12:17 a.m.
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
Len Ovens <len(a)ovenwerks.net> wrote:
The only thing I would like to see different in
a2jmidi is the naming. (I am
not sure how jack1 works) a2j opens as one client called a2j that when expanded
has the alsa client name followed by the actual port name. This is hard to read
and use. It is also confusing to new users who ask where the port is just
because a2j has not been expanded. I would guess the best thing (from a user
POV) would be for a2j to open a new jack client for each ALSA client with the
ALSA name. I am not sure what other consequences this would have though :)
^ this ^
The existing arrangement makes it far from clear what the connections are.
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.