16 Jun
2007
16 Jun
'07
12:32 a.m.
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 01:19 +0200, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
Jan Depner:
I didn't say never complain. I said quit whining. I haven't seen a
single post in this thread that had a single constructive piece of
advice on how to correct the perceived problems with Ardour. It is OK
to tell them you are not satisfied with it but how about asking for
specific fixes to specific problems?
(and is fixing it as we speak). My advice to
those who are not
satisfied with Ardour is to 1) give money to the developers, 2) learn to
code and get to work on it, 3) learn to code and write your own DAW, or
4) go whine elsewhere.
No, I can not agree with this. We must be allowed to point out
what we think is wrong with ardour without doing 1, 2, 3 or 4. If someone
thinks something is wrong with any of my programs, I really want them
to tell me so, and I don't require any money or code contributions from
anyone. And I'm pretty sure Paul Davis, Thorstein Wilms, etc. thinks so
too.
There are more or less polite, and more or less constructive ways to
complain, so to suggest that you should never tell the authors of
Ardour that you are not satisfied with it, is just plain stupid.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
--
Jan 'Evil Twin' Depner
http://myweb.cableone.net/eviltwin69
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of
arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to
skid in sideways, chardonnay in one hand, chocolate in the other, body
thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming 'WOO HOO, what a ride'"