22 Dec
2015
22 Dec
'15
11:39 a.m.
On 22/12/15 at 10:56am, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 08:31:58 +0100, Raffaele Morelli
wrote:
Distro are not "long term release", as the phrase says, releases are long term
support or
not.
Releases and distros have nothing to do with the whole point at all, apples and oranges.
Repost can be added and source code is available, if someone can't manage with repos
and
source code the problem is not the cli he is going to use... but the user itself.
You can happily use bash, zsh, korn or whatever shell you like on your distro and
compiling has nothing to do with the one you choose.
--
«My mama said to get things done
You'd better not mess with Major Tom»
"commandline friendly" is totally
meaningless
No it isn't, depending to the user's needs, the kind of used distro has
impact. If a user e.g. wants to use command line mainly to compile
software that isn't availbale by the repositories for the packages,
then it makes a difference if a user e.g. chose a long term support
release distro or a distro that often provide releases or a rolling
release.