16 Sep
2009
16 Sep
'09
7:33 a.m.
hollunder(a)gmx.at wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:11:58 +0200
Atte Andre Jensen <atte.jensen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
All fine, but that doesn't have to mean the
project is dead.
I only tried the sequencer and that seems to work fine.
Man this looks like a promising (revolutionary) project, at first sight
at least...!!
\r
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Those are very inactive projects to my knowledge, and also not tested a
lot. The mailinglists are dead and the IRC channel pretty much the
same and there's no bug tracker.
I think I reported an issue (build related) once and don't know if I
even got an answer. Seems like it couldn't even record any audio.
The sequencer might be usable. Was this mentioned in the discussion about a
'Ableton Live' for
Linux?
http://non.tuxfamily.org/
I don't think so, at least I never saw it before.
I just discovered it and it looks pretty cool,
fast, easy and good
for live.
It indeed looks cool. Both apps compiled like a charm here (arch
linux), that's a good sign :-)
I only oped both apps very beiefly, so I'm must play with them later,
but what leads you to believe they are "good for live"? My first
impression is that they seem to be rather a traditional daw and
sequencer (well the sequencer not so much traditional)...
Thanks for mentioning these apps!