24 Mar
2004
24 Mar
'04
4:05 p.m.
Hi,
onsdagen den 24 mars 2004 17.12 skrev tim hall:
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 7:44 am, James Stone
wrote:
Thanks to Joachim Schiele MusE does now have a Wiki, and we are already
preparing some content for it. Hopefully we will have prepared some more
useful documentation in the near future. Interested people are quite welcome
to add content! :)
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 12:49:50AM +0000, tim
hall wrote:
Right, I was slightly off-beam.
You set the tempo using Edit>Mastertrack>... (in bpm) - ignore this %tempo
widget.
I guess that the rationale for this control is for when you want to record
something at half speed or whatever, without altering the Master track's
bpm settings. The default is 120bpm and this tempo fine-tune is obviously
set to 100%. The documentation for MusE is virtually non-existent, On Wednesday 24 March 2004 12:04 am, antoine
rivoire wrote:
No its not (AFAIK).
When you start Muse, the default is 100%, 120 bpm. a simple stupid question: in muse the tempo is in
percentage?
or is 100 really 100 bpm? what is the rationale here?
It's BPM. what is
not obvious is that this very prominent widget is not designed for setting
the tempo - It's for altering the tempo in % steps. Hope that makes sense.
Right. MusE does not run /well/ if it does not have access to rtc and realtime
capabilities. Timing will be off.
What does muse -R do?
Runs it in realtime, if you're not connected via Jackd. Maybe I'm kludging a bit, I'm still using
0.6.1, which doesn't work well
with Jackd. (Help not required, I know why). I'm looking forward to
upgrading.
You should definitively upgrade, 0.6.3 is heaps better than 0.6.1 at audio and
jack.
I'm a little wary of rolling my own, but MusE will
be a likely
candidate if I decide to bite the bullet.
You mean that there are none available for your system? Not that it's that
difficult to build MusE. Autoconf is always a problem though... :-/
Regards,
Robert