On Sunday 26 October 2008 19:11:53 Burkhard Ritter wrote:
drew Roberts schrieb:
On Saturday 25 October 2008 05:40:14 Robin Gareus
wrote:
> *
http://ccmixter.linuxaudio.org - for a short time.around
>
http://www.linuxaudio.org/mailarchive/lau/2007/11/15 we set up a
> bare-bone
ccmixter.org intended for Music-Made-With-Linux. Should you
> desire to style and maintain a ccmixter community: here's your chance.
I am interested in such a site for music not only made with linux but
carrying Free licenses like cc BY and BY-SA. I would need help and also
am concerned about the legal aspects of running such a site. Are there
legal resources and a legal entity umbrella to help with this?
I'm sorry I can't help you with that;
lam.fugal.net circumvents this by
only collecting links to such songs, not the data itself.
OK, but I am wary of that too, thoughts anyone? A ccmixter type site
would actually host files... Hmmm, I wonder if the code could be changed
to let the internet archive host the files?
I don't see the problem there. If we are careful with the licenses it
should be fine to host and stream the music. Now I haven't looked at
ccmixter.org in detail but it seems to be pretty large, complicated;
probably overkill for us. What I could imagine is taking the
lam.fugal.net-add-music-page and adding some stuff: _optionally_ allow
users to upload the file instead of (or additionally to) providing a
url, requiring them to choose a license (most likely Creative Commons)
that actually allows us to host and stream the file. Visitors can then
download appropriately licensed music from
linuxaudio.org. Later we
could add a moderated or random stream, in addition to a m3u playlist.
I need to remember to comment on this when I have more time.
linuxaudio.org can help out with technical aspects: setup, provide
bandwidth, backup and diskspace. Someone else will need to jump in for
the license details. - I guess you will need to provide a phone-number
so that PPL can call in to remove cumbersome content :(
You are thinking DMCA type notification wrt "cumbersome content"???
Is there really need for something like this? When we just accept
properly licensed music files?
Unfortunately, there probably is such a need. People may put up tracks where
the work belongs to others and indicate a license that they have no right to
apply. IIRC, the folks over at
ourmedia.org ran into this issue a good bit.
Regards,
Burkhard
all the best,
drew