8 Apr
2003
8 Apr
'03
6:01 p.m.
On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 09:38:52 -0700, R Parker wrote:
That's the GNU's counter part to the GPL for
documenation? That would get my vote. However, I defer
any decision on licensing to Steve. I think Steve
should have copyright on the documentation. If I work
on it and am credited, I'm happy.
Hell no. I really can't be trusted with docs, I can't spell, my grammar is
terrible, you name it :) I really dont undeastand how anyone could bring
themsevles to write docs without being payed or made to ;)
I write code, if other people are prepared to document it then that's
great. The copyright should belong to the authors.
- Steve