On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:15:50 +0300
Louigi Verona <louigi.verona(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I second what Ralf says.
There is a nice Russian article on the subject. Shortly speaking, it
is about the fact that art has always been standing on other artists'
shoulders. But now such a stance is denied to artists and it is
sometimes even deemed shameful if you are using synth presets,
instead of coming up with your own. So the article speaks of how the
cult of originality has toned down creativity and that songwriters
spend too much time trying to make original presets and arrangements
instead of writing songs and how much time is spent in doing
something original just for the sake of originality.
I am very much with what the author says. I do not see a problem with
anyone using another composer's melody. In fact, isn't this is what
composers write songs for, so that people can play and sing them?
Indeed, economical thinking has distorted perception of art greatly
with this concept of originality.
Hi Louigi, I too like very much what you've written and couldn't agree
more.
I believe that imitation is at the basis of every art, and it should
not only be allowed, but encouraged. Of course I'm not talking about
plagiarism - that one does it only to become popular, but it doesn't do
it to express himself (which is what art is about).
cheers
renato