30 Jul
2004
30 Jul
'04
3:31 p.m.
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:50:28 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote
agreed - I'd rather extend LADSPA to allow things like disk access and other
non realtime tasks than create a new standard. Is this at all possible?
dave
two is a
buffer reading oscillator. which is to say, a sample player,
but one that has controllable playback functiosn, as if it were any
old wavetable synth. but that wavetable could be a many minute long
sample?
I really (really) would like to have a sample module too, but you can't
do it with LADSPA, and I'm VERY hesitant to introduce another
program-specific module format (ala SSM, ams, etc.) The duplication
of effort there is awful.