Re: [LAU] Foul Language

Even with his vulgarity and drugs, would Jimi dig a thread where people tell each other their attitudes on music suck? I think bringing him up in this argument was a complete red herring. He would be the one saying "It's all right, it's all right." -Chuckk On 4/8/07, Vince Werber <ka1iic(a)prexar.com> wrote: > Hendrix ??? As in the 101st Airborne Jimi...??? > He could toss a few words but then allot of us could back then... some > of us still do... > > vince > > On Sunday 08 April 2007 16:22, Chuckk Hubbard wrote: > > On 4/8/07, David Baron <d_baron(a)012.net.il> wrote: > > > So am I, sort of. Grew up in the 60s. Woodstock. The whole hippie > > > scene. I loved Hendricks, though I was more a "folkie". He and all > > > the others that took tremendous talent and used it for vulgar (and > > > narcotic) things all ended the same. What a tremendous and horrid > > > pity. What a waste. > > > > > > Enjoy Zappa. This does not mean using cheap or foul language in a > > > public forum about Linux and music which has members of all ideas and > > > backgrounds, does it? > > > > I was actually not thinking of Zappa's music (you must know that he > > was narcotic-free). I was thinking of some of his publicly broadcast > > arguments with do-gooders during the Tipper fiasco. Even face-to-face > > he let them have it. > > You misspell Hendrix and call him vulgar. lol thanks for your opinion. > > David Crosby is miraculously still alive. He had that folk sound > > down, but he did more drugs than... well anyone, AFAIK. > > > > -Chuckk > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user