7 Oct
2006
7 Oct
'06
12:54 a.m.
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:30:35AM -0400, Rob wrote:
On Thursday 05 October 2006 07:26, Dave Phillips
wrote:
I certainly would appreciate GPL/LGPL plugins, but why wouldn't
someone trying to develop a Linux plugin use LADSPA?
Hi Rob,
They might want users of other operating systems to be able to use their
plugin in any software they like, including a GPL Windows audio
application.
Actually, I have a question about that. If person A made a VST that
was GPL, and person B loaded it into a proprietary audio app, wouldn't
it technically have to be GPL in order to dynamically link in the GPL
plugin? This seems to me to be a bit like binary blobs in the kernel.
Best regards,
Chris.
-------------------
chris(a)mccormick.cx
http://mccormick.cx
There will
never be native Linux VST plugins, VST has a
non-free license.
A little hope never hurts. Ico is now trying to lobby
Yamaha/Steinberg into a license change to make it more
favorable to FOSS development.