19 Oct
2011
19 Oct
'11
1:56 p.m.
On Wednesday 19 October 2011 11:23:09 Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
On 10/19/2011 10:52 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Completely rebuilding Jamin with single plugins will consume even more cpu
than jamin itself. The reason is that jamin is actually built from plugins
(the look-ahead and the compressors are plugins) but also merges plugins
internally to optimize for speed...
Have fun,
Arnold
+1, regarding to Jamin is good and it does work
without pumping.
I'm not so fond of JAMin. It has flaws and consumes way too much CPU.
About a year ago Patrick Shirkey mentioned that there was no other JACK
application that attempts to provide a complete mastering chain. But
that was about a year ago, at the moment it is perfectly possible to
create a similar tool chain with the help of plug-ins. I prefer plug-ins
then, more flexible.