On Thursday 24 January 2008 10:02:03 Matthias Schönborn wrote:
I realised that when using 128 Frames per Period
instead of 64, it works
perfectly. At least it did for like three hours yesterday evening. It's a
great tool for composing, I think!
See below for the output.
Thanks for your report. I've just released klick 0.6, containing the fix for
this crash, and many other JACK transport related improvements.
http://das.nasophon.de/klick/
Dominic
(gdb) thread apply all bt
Thread 2 (process 5965):
#0 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0xb7d05e96 in nanosleep () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#2 0xb7d3fb3c in usleep () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#3 0x0804ab80 in Klick::run (this=0x807a008) at klick.cc:174
#4 0x0804a8bb in main (argc=8, argv=0xbffc1784) at main.cc:39
Thread 1 (process 5968):
#0 0x08051ce6 in AudioInterface::process_mix_samples (this=0x807a138,
dest=0xb7c24000, src=0x807b8f8,
length=2122, volume=1) at audio_interface.cc:197
#1 0x08051ef2 in AudioInterface::process_mix (this=0x807a138,
buffer=0xb7c13a00, nframes=64)
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
at audio_interface.cc:181
#2 0x08051ff9 in AudioInterface::process_callback_ (nframes=64,
arg=0x807a138) at audio_interface.cc:139
#3 0xb7f81f09 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libjack.so.0
#4 0x00000040 in ?? ()
#5 0x0807a138 in ?? ()
#6 0x000003e8 in ?? ()
#7 0x00000003 in ?? ()
#8 0x00000000 in ?? ()