30 Oct
2003
30 Oct
'03
4:39 a.m.
Hallo,
iriXx hat gesagt: // iriXx wrote:
Guy Daniel CLOTILDE wrote:
No. The "it" in "it is not free" here means the right to distribute
something (also commercially), and if this costs something, "it" is not
free in the RMS sense.
ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
Daniel James wrote / a écrit:
RMS would disagree. In the case of music, if someone wanted to
distribute a CC'd licenced
piece commercially, paying the artist a fair cut, then all they'd
have to do is contact the artist in the usual way and work out a
deal. What's wrong with that?
stepping inside... There's nothing wrong, but if it costs something
(again, nothing wrong) then it's not... free. I think that's what Frank
was pointing out.