On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:56:09AM +0200, Julien Claassen wrote:
I could see something, which wouldn't be
realtime, but perhaps
workable. You might operate with 200 bands and then finally print the
bands, that had clipping, very loud peaks or something of the sort. I
think it could be done. You analyse, log each of the volumes in one
variable, incrementing it, when necessary and then you compare them and
print out the 10 highest bands. Probably the criterion should be more
like: print all above xDB. Or xDB above average. Nevger having used
something like it, I wouldn't know by what to go. Well I think a good
deal of users might not know the citerion behind it, but just pick the
peaks out.
And then ? What are you going to do with e.g. a list of the ten
highest bands ? Do you really think that doing some filtering on
those frequencies is going to improve your mix or levels ?
Ciao,
--
FA