13 Apr
2008
13 Apr
'08
2:17 p.m.
schoappied wrote:
Assuming that depending on liblash is an indication of LASH support, then MusE
has it, and Rosegarden does not. I think that's probably true anyway, and
this just all but confirms it.
The way things are running these days, I think LASH support would require an
interested third party coming aboard to implement and debug it. Somebody who
already knows all about LASH, and who really cares about bringing LASH to
Rosegarden. If you wait for one of us to do this, I doubt it will ever
happen.
-- D. Michael McIntyre
We're searching for people who really wants to make LASH supported by
Rosegarden....!
Thanks in advance,
Dirk
Mysth-R wrote:
Ok, I made the first step and mailed to the Rosegarden mailinglist, with
the LASH question.... This was his answer:
On Sunday 13 April 2008, schoappied wrote:
And advice other
people to use it, cause I have the idea that not many people now about
the existence of LASH....
Yes because not many softwares provide this option :)
Perhaps making more advertising around LASH could moves things ?
Mysth-R
the well known circle ;)
I think not all the developers of the linux audio apps will follow and
read the LAU mailinglist.. So you should post a message/ question for
lash support on their mailinglist....
_______________________________________________
There is LASH
support for seq24 and Muse, so I is and possible and
usable! Would be great to see it in Rosegarden too.