17 Nov
2017
17 Nov
'17
1:25 a.m.
On November 16, 2017 10:44:42 AM HST, David Santamauro <david.santamauro(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 11/16/2017 01:46 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Well, when I made an attempt to use Ardour, I quickly figured out that its design assumed
I was a fluent user of a traditional hardware mixer and an experienced sound tech/engineer
... but I'm no music pro, so could just be me.
At the same time, I handled the physical tasks of connecting cables between modules on a
Moog ages ago, so maybe Ardour needs a more physical UI? ;)
--
David W. Jones
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
http://dancingtreefrog.com
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail.
IMO Ardours user interface is completely ignoring
the way most
creative
people think, at least when being creative.
It's possible for
everybody
Ok, I'll bite (although every time I respond to you I feel like I'm
being trolled): How in the world can you drop a blanket statement
assuming to understand how "most" creative people think, or what they
like, or how they manage their work flow, or how they'll view a gif of
a
dancing something or another ... or what their preferred whatever is
...? -- the answer is: you can't.
Unless you have done some serious polling of a large enough set of
people who have some sort of proven creativity, what you say above is
complete horse shit. If by chance you have conducted such a poll,
please
show the results from the question: "While in the throes of
creativity,
does Ardour's user interface completely ignore how you think?"