6 Feb
2006
6 Feb
'06
9:17 a.m.
On 2/6/06, leslie.polzer(a)gmx.net <leslie.polzer(a)gmx.net> wrote:
Hello Loki,
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 10:11:58AM +1100, Loki Davison wrote:
As i said originally, om is big and powerful with
it's standard gui.
The engine however is very light weight
Also in terms of dependencies?
if it were lighter than jack rack and more
stable.
Don't forget that we are talking about a complete rewrite of JACK Rack 1
(which is quite stable in its own right).
Leslie
--
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x52D70289
http://nic-nac-project.de/~skypher/
From the om site.
The Om engine (which can be built by itself) requires:
Liblo 0.22 and above
Jack 0.99 and above.
And can optionally use:
Alsa sequencer
DSSI
LADSPA
It would also be great for overworked Dave to get some help ;-)
Loki